Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
6 hours ago.
by Shopsteward
rocker
#1

Daily breaking news and news the liberal media doesn't want you to know, won't report, or just daily news issues.

Americans for many years have had to rely on left leaning biased news reporting from liberal media such as NBC, ABC, and CBS and the New York Times. As most of these outlets struggle to remain on the air and in print, the new media is flourishing and people are hearing both sides of the issues. This forum will provide people with a place to discuss daily news issues of any kind or discuss articles not printed or aired by the liberal news outlets.

 
 

Member Comments

absolem

as found on constitutioncenter dot org:

"This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed Constitution would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation. The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.

Implicit in the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two shared assumptions. First, that the proposed new Constitution gave the federal government almost total legal authority over the army and militia. Second, that the federal government should not have any authority at all to disarm the citizenry. They disagreed only about whether an armed populace could adequately deter federal oppression.

The Second Amendment conceded nothing to the Anti-Federalists’ desire

Posted 66 days ago.

Shopsteward

Another lie of the left. Do u really think the founders cared so much about hunting they enshrined that right in the Constitution?

Posted 66 days ago.

Shopsteward

NASCAR what does deer hunting have to do with the Second Amendment?

Posted 66 days ago.

And just what is their "agenda" ? Maybe keeping some whack-job from killing someone from 1 1/2 miles away ? It isnt good for anything other than killing !Its no different than owning a military assault weapon , no one needs one of those either !

Posted 66 days ago.

Coaluser

and elk and moose.

Posted 66 days ago.

Coaluser

Hunters out west on the plains regularly make 500 yard or more shots on mule deer. These are not easy shots, keep in mind. Takes much practice and skill. The armor piercing ammo is not available to civilians. Another anti gun group spreading stupidity to further their agenda.

Posted 66 days ago.

NasCarNut

These 'anti-materiel' sniping rifles can strike accurately from a distance of more than a mile" (1.6 kilometers), the Violence Policy Center, a non-profit organization that advocates for gun control said.

"They can penetrate light armor, down helicopters, destroy commercial aircraft, and blast through rail cars and bulk storage tanks filled with explosive or toxic chemicals, all with potentially catastrophic effect."

and these semi automatic weapons are for sale to civilians...who needs a gun like this to harvest a deer??...

Posted 66 days ago.

Abby , our problems started when one side didnt get their way and have chosen to make the divide unassailable .Instead of putting the differences aside and uniting to govern fairly . This strategy winds up costing the regular folk the most and puts our economy at risk .

Posted 66 days ago.

NasCarNut

Official state rifle -

Senators in Tennessee -- in a near unanimous vote -- designated a rifle that is said to be capable of destroying commercial aircraft as an official state symbol.

hmmm...

Posted 66 days ago.

absolem

Sure would...so would composition and density.i hope your world goes exceedingly well for you.

Posted 66 days ago.

moderation

When splitting hairs, the degree of difficulty increases with the fineness of the hair, no?

Posted 66 days ago.

absolem

Moderation.....I would hope your suggested intent is wrong. In addition....it appears that the darker the hair, the thicker it tends to be...from what I have read.

Posted 66 days ago.

moderation

absolem-You know exactly what was implied by coal. And,the characteristic fine composition of red hair, is my response to the splitting of hairs comparison used by yourself. Good morning to you.

Posted 66 days ago.

absolem

sorry gents...good morning to you all.

Posted 66 days ago.

absolem

moderation....of what variety is that red hair? that will determine the nastinest level of your compliment....also, i think "dusty" is more than capable of thinking and expressing themselves on any level they wish. we all don't have to layer the subject to make our point.

Posted 66 days ago.

absolem

OWO...there are no guarantee's if none are sought. the empathy exuded when in close proximity of that which we seek to prevent is our downfall in the guarantee of a promised product....which is a safe and free society. the wheat and chaff come to mind. both must be allowed to grow. however, given free will, we are allowed to control the two. have we failed at both or is it just in our "genes"?

Posted 66 days ago.

moderation

But, do you really think dusty can hypothesize on that level, absolem ?

Posted 67 days ago.

moderation

Thanks for the response absolem. Yes that is splitting a hair. A red one at that.

Posted 67 days ago.

Change is inevitable Abby ! We can only hope it will be for the better but there are no guarantee's

Posted 67 days ago.

absolem

given the opportunity to change. i do not wish for the America i know to become that way.....we are spoiled because of the efforts of those before us and depend on those ahead to keep us living as close to being free as possible.

Posted 67 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or