Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
19 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
rocker
#1

Daily breaking news and news the liberal media doesn't want you to know, won't report, or just daily news issues.

Americans for many years have had to rely on left leaning biased news reporting from liberal media such as NBC, ABC, and CBS and the New York Times. As most of these outlets struggle to remain on the air and in print, the new media is flourishing and people are hearing both sides of the issues. This forum will provide people with a place to discuss daily news issues of any kind or discuss articles not printed or aired by the liberal news outlets.

 
 

Member Comments

moderation

lts said," Munster, ........... you demmies are great at crowing and posturing about peoples rights all the while regulating and taxing them to the point of being useless and not worth the effort. how utterly democratic". If you don't mind,lts, include some specifics to your generalization.

Posted 614 days ago.

luvthesouth

munster...it seems there is no honest argument that will ever change your mind. weakness has no bearing on it because you don't understand the point. if you honestly thought for one moment that your "assault weapon" ban would stop or prevent the killing of more than one individual then you are more deluded than i already think you are....at least on this subject.... and politics and ....business and oh well you get the picture. you just have a very different viewpoint. i have long said that when i can walk down any street in america anytime of the day or night without even the most remote possibility of being the victim of a crime then i would truly say that weapons for protection would no longer be needed. contact me when you or your fellow thinkers are willing to bet your lives and not my safety.

Posted 615 days ago.

luvthesouth

that is exactly the point munster. do you desire others to legislate or limit the free exercise of your right? not because you have hurt anyone, but simply because someone else has? what if i felt like you did not need your computer. would you allow me to make and enforce that decision?

Posted 615 days ago.

luvthesouth

munster from some of your posts, many would deem it not necessary for you to "need" a computer...but alas you do currently have the right and choose to exercise it. you demmies are great at crowing and posturing about peoples rights all the while regulating and taxing them to the point of being useless and not worth the effort. how utterly democratic.

Posted 615 days ago.

luvthesouth

breaking news...obama heads to florida for a "weekend with the boys"....obama hints that daughter may be dating...obama overheard asking...where is senator menendez anyway?....full story at 11:00.

Posted 616 days ago.

Munster you should compare how well Walker and Christys states are doing compared to the ones ran by demokrats.

Posted 616 days ago.

BeRight

Unemployment is 7.9%.

Posted 617 days ago.

BeRight

I was late for work because the interview with a possible new employer went longer than I expected.

Posted 619 days ago.

BeRight

Best reasons for being late: • Employee dropped her purse into a coin-operated newspaper box and couldn't retrieve it without change -- which was in the purse.

• Employee accidentally left the apartment with his roommate's girlfriend's shoes on and had to go back to change.

• Employee's angry wife had frozen his truck keys in a glass of water in the freezer.

• Employee got a late start because she was putting a raincoat on her concrete duck in her front yard, because rain was expected later that day.

• Employee's car wouldn't start because the device measuring blood-alcohol level showed he was intoxicated.

• Employee attempted to cut his own hair before work and the clippers stopped working, so he had to wait until the barber shop opened to fix his hair.

• Employee's car was attacked by a bear. (Employee had photographic evidence.)

• Employee drove to her previous employer by mistake.

• Employee claimed to have delivered a stranger's baby on the side of the hig

Posted 619 days ago.

luvthesouth

just think what i could do if i could get them to join my P.E.T.S. Foundation. skeets would rejoice all around the world.

Posted 620 days ago.

luvthesouth

munster...i think you are getting what you ask for already. there is quite a bit of truth on here. the truth can come in the form of a political or social ideology that you may not agree with...but it is still a truth whether you choose to accept it or not. not all truth eminates from the democratic party or the administration...which we have found out is not above lying when needed.

Posted 620 days ago.

luvthesouth

munster...and neither will they.

Posted 620 days ago.

luvthesouth

munster, you need to take a cold hard look at the state of California. that is a prime example of your utopian democratically inspired governing system. the main problem they have is the inability to build the fence to keep the money-generators from high-tailing it out of the state. when your producers no longer produce...whom do you squeeze? ah...that is answered at the federal level. just call on the democratically controlled admininstration and they will take more of other americans money to fund the bad decisions made by Sacramento.

Posted 620 days ago.

luvthesouth

munster, you are quite the funny fella. you support "no labels" all the while slinging your derogatory "labels". you have got to be kidding. lead by example munster. change your words before asking others to change theirs. show it works.

Posted 620 days ago.

luvthesouth

i feel so fortunate that i have such easily deluded, self-appreciating, left-wing folks to invite to join the new organization that i am putting together. after the recent admission by our president that he shoots skeets on a regular basis, i thought it would be timely to create the P.E.T.S. foundation. after joining you will be one of the "People for the Ethical Treatment of Skeets". we must ask, could the shooting of the traditional black skeets be wrought with racial undertones? only sharpton & msnbc knows. we support the protection of all colors of skeet. we do not discriminate. along with your Donation of $100.00 U.S. dollars (we must specify U.S.), you get the following sent directly to you: one (1) nifty information pack (recycled paper), (1) bumper sticker (environmentally safe), and (1) t-shirt (please specify size..no color choice). disclaimer: a portion of your donation will go to support... well....me. :-)

Posted 620 days ago.

BeRight

no, I meant libs.

Posted 620 days ago.

BeRight

The Pope announces his resignation and Chris Mathews leads off with Catholics and Birth Control. Liberals and Birth Control, what is it with them?

Posted 621 days ago.

luvthesouth

you need to research the legislation being proposed about this very subject of domestic drones. i merely posted what is being reported on a news site. it is very real and something that must be addressed. i suggest you investigate this on your own. you may wish to start with the ACLU website.

Posted 626 days ago.

luvthesouth

workingstiff: "One aspect of the measure not discussed by the report is what the legal rammifications would be of a legally armed U.S. citizens shooting down or hacking a drone that was spying on them or a nearby neighbor. As unlikely as that scenario sounds, it could happen if use soars. It can be safely presumed that the responsible agency would try to charge the citizen for destroying federal property, obstruction of justice, or other similar charges. The real question is what the courts would make of such a case." we can always tell them we thought they were skeets! president obama has our backs on that excuse!

Posted 626 days ago.

BeRight

except: • You have the right to remain silent. • Anything you say or do may be used against you in a court of law. • You have the right to consult an attorney before speaking to the police and to have an attorney present during questioning now or in the future. • If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you before any questioning, if you wish. • If you decide to answer any questions now, without an attorney present, you will still have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to an attorney. • Knowing and understanding your rights as I have explained them to you, are you willing to answer my questions without an attorney present? And a trial by jury.

Posted 627 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or