Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
9 minutes ago.
by slinky
rocker
#1

Daily breaking news and news the liberal media doesn't want you to know, won't report, or just daily news issues.

Americans for many years have had to rely on left leaning biased news reporting from liberal media such as NBC, ABC, and CBS and the New York Times. As most of these outlets struggle to remain on the air and in print, the new media is flourishing and people are hearing both sides of the issues. This forum will provide people with a place to discuss daily news issues of any kind or discuss articles not printed or aired by the liberal news outlets.

 
 

Member Comments

Shopsteward

"even though you stuck your tail between your legs and scampered from my invitation to clarify your statement."

And this is of course conducive to"rational discourse".

Posted 147 days ago.

Shopsteward

Thanks I will "restassured".

Posted 147 days ago.

harryanderson

Or being clever.

Posted 147 days ago.

harryanderson

Restassured, my friend, I had no intention of trapping you are being clever. such tactics foil rational discourse. I only wanted to learn where you think the line should be drawn.

Posted 147 days ago.

Shopsteward

No Harry i dont feel trapped by you at all, you are just not that clever

Posted 147 days ago.

Nope , never did find them WMD's

Posted 147 days ago.

harryanderson

I feel sorry for anybody who, when asked to clarify his or her own statement, feels the questioner has trapped him or her.

Posted 147 days ago.

Shopsteward

Coal Harry will try to drag u into little traps he sets, if you fail to follow his breadcrumb trail he claims you "tuck tail" ;). He hates to be out maneuvered

Posted 147 days ago.

Speaking of WMD's , they never did find any of em in Iraq . And the way Dubya and his people talked the darned things were in every village ! Hmmmmmmmmmm , you dont suppose Bush lied now do you ?

Posted 147 days ago.

Coaluser

Harry - How in the world is that even relevant?? I will ask you . Should anyone in this world be allowed to wire tap a phone? Should anyone in this world be allowed administrator access to Verizon wireless accounts and controls ? Does that also mean NO ONE IN THE USA should have these accesses ? Don't try to skew this stuff around. Nuclear weapons are not even comparing apples to apples... We should be talking about knives, swords, hammers stuff like that - not WMD's for God sake.

Posted 147 days ago.

Need Harry , thats the question !

Posted 148 days ago.

harryanderson

Coal user,

Do you believe anybody should be able to buy a nuke?

Posted 148 days ago.

harryanderson

Coal user,

I believe my hypothetical suitcase-nuke seeker covers the finger on that trigger.

I wrote, "The real questions are WHAT arms should be available to WHOM."

Posted 148 days ago.

Coaluser

You guys keep barking up the wrong tree. The gun isn't the assailant. The gun cant pull its own trigger. If there were no one there to pull it, a gun would NEVER go off on its own. Why the focus is not correctly placed is the entire problem here. JEEZE

Posted 148 days ago.

absolem

Harry...i would hope our friend would source his suitacase nuke from a domestic manufacturer. the hopefully sizeable bump in GDP before annihilation will be conforting to those sympathetic to this administration and its global harmony.

Posted 148 days ago.

harryanderson

Very few of us would conclude that citizens should have access to any arms they can purchase.

Suppose, for example, our local radical Muslim, who is a US citizen with no convictions on his record, sought to buy a suitcase nuke from a Pakistani company. Most of us would favor limiting his right to keep and bear that arm.

The real questions are WHAT arms should be available to WHOM.

Posted 148 days ago.

Shopsteward

Frankly, my dear i couldnt care less what you conclude

Posted 148 days ago.

Shopsteward

Oh dear fraudulant Harry, i am under no obligation to answer any question you pose, nor are you so obligated. The idea that i "tucked my tail" from your towering intelect bears witness to your over inflated ego.

Posted 148 days ago.

harryanderson

By refusing to clarify, you leave us free to conclude citizens, in your opinion, should have arms "parity" with the military. Of course, that has to include the deadliest weapons the military has.

Posted 148 days ago.

harryanderson

Shopsteward,you asked for the purpose of an armed citizenry.

According to the second amendment, it's because a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state.

There. Now, I've answered your question, even though you stuck your tail between your legs and scampered from my invitation to clarify your statement.

Posted 148 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or