Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by thegreek
BeRight
#1

Obama's war on cheap energy

What's does Obama find so offensive about cheap energy?

 
 

Member Comments

thegreek

I cannot explain them with facts and reason that your biased mind will accept as anything other that nonsense to you !! You both are that FAR GONE !!! Shame.

Posted 1 hour ago.

Ohwiseone

Also greek they R the problem !

Posted 2 days ago.

Kendall78

More like frustration from not explaining your pov with facts and reason.

Posted 2 days ago.

thegreek

Not desperation. Exasperation.

Posted 2 days ago.

Kendall78

"2 closed minded, know nothing boobs."

Ah name calling...a sign of desperation.

Posted 2 days ago.

Kendall78

"Disarm to get control. Are you for real?"

That could go for many different things Greek. If you are going to talk about Socialism, try doing it in reference unique to Socialism.

I know staying on topic will be a revolutionary idea for you but try it ;)

Posted 2 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Your train of thought greek just got off at the station !

Posted 2 days ago.

Ohwiseone

So does that mean that a democracy is the same as socialism ?

Posted 2 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Under that logic then we are part of that scenario , we disarmed the native americans !

Posted 2 days ago.

thegreek

Because there is no step in Socialism that says anything about taking weapons away.

Steps ?? It is a no brainer. Disarm to get control. Are you for real??

Posted 2 days ago.

thegreek

Wednesday, 06 June 2012 10:43 With UN Support, Socialist Chavez Disarms Civilians in Venezuela Written by Alex Newman

There you go. I would have a much better conversation with the inmates at a psycho ward than with you 2 closed minded, know nothing boobs.

That was not from Fox. I just said that about unions to try to show you how stupid you opinion is about guns but I should have known you are to dense to get that because you are too focused on blaming the R's.

Posted 2 days ago.

Kendall78

"a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies."

Your copy/paste definition is correct but I am afraid you slapped on something that was untrue. Because there is no step in Socialism that says anything about taking weapons away.

Posted 2 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And greek , union workers had pay and benefits that were above the norm , helping people achieve the american dream !Sorry that your republican bosses don't want you to know that !

Posted 2 days ago.

Kendall78

Ignoring your factless rant..let's focus on this: "And you are ignorant of the fact that if it werent for guns you both would not enjoy the freedom or security you both take for granted now"

I am fully aware of the security that weapons can bring to our lives when held by responsible people in authority. I am also aware of the danger that weapons pose when the wrong people have them.

"What do you think keeps people from running wild in the streets and causing mayhem in your neighborhoods?"

A decent moral core more than the threat of getting punished.

Posted 2 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Well you finally got the definition so that means you looked at something other than your right-wing crap fests ! But you logic doesn't necessarily follow the republican line !And just what does joining a union have to do with you not understanding what socialism is ? Your adherence to the brain dead republican lies and bullcrap doesnt help you look any more intelligent !

Posted 2 days ago.

thegreek

There is no good reason for anyone to join a worthless union that take monthly dues for a contract that is no better than an employee handbook either but I dont get on here and spew that because it is their RIGHT...

Posted 2 days ago.

thegreek

Socialism : a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies.

And first priority is to strip them of their ability to uprise and defend themselves for total control..

Posted 2 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Greek , regardless there still is no good reason for regular citizens to own military assault weapons !I do agree that yes the military should have the latest and best but a person like you shouldn't be allowed near one !And also greek , you and your little brainwashed buddies need to actually look up what a socialist is before trying to pass a lot of right-wing talking points !

Posted 2 days ago.

thegreek

And you are ignorant of the fact that if it werent for guns you both would not enjoy the freedom or security you both take for granted now !! What do you think keeps people from running wild in the streets and causing mayhem in your neighborhoods?? Have you personally achieved some tactics of security? Security system? Dogs? Police? Bodyguards - with knives?

Posted 2 days ago.

thegreek

You 2 dont educate too well do you? There is absolutely no use discussing this nonsense with you since you both already have your minds made up. That is not only extremely STUPID but a shameful waste of brain cells not to mention the fact that you spew your rediculous opinions about stuff you are ignorant about. Posting nonsense on the wrong topic shows how scatter brain you both are and there is absolutely no use in debating either one of you because your goal is to get the last word in so it appears as if you have won by shutting someone up !!

Posted 2 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or