Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
29 days ago.
by asknot
BobDahler
#1

What happened to the "Union Influence in Politics" topic?

Even though I initiated it as the debut topic in the Times forums, I'm happy to realize it has been deleted. It died an ugly death long ago, and should have been executed long before it was. I'm curious though... Why? I am unaware of the travesty that occurred that was sufficiently heinous to warrant it's deletion... As compared to the tripe on ALL the other threads that is evident on a daily basis.

 
 

Member Comments

Knowsbest

Wow , what a line of crap !! So I suppose this is your new "go to" website ! Well thats their opinion as idiotic as it is !Unions are still the line in the sand for the safety of workers ! And unions assure workers rights and keep businesses from taking advantage of workers ! I think the history of unions tells the true story ! Things like the 40 hr work week , child labor laws , paid vacations , sick days , and the list goes on and on ! You may not be union but you can thank unions for what benefits you get !When poor wrongriki cant find a VALID arguement this is the garbage you have to deal with !Deflect ,deny , mis-lead and lie , thats exactly what wrongriki is doing now ! Please back up your claim (lie) that I'm receiving benefits from the union !Please let us all in on it !

Posted 417 days ago.

Tiredofit

Good night MUNSTER I hope you have a nice evening.

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

I cannot tell, as I dont know you, if you really believe the tripe you spew or you are just fool enough to vomit back anything your party tells you. I am leaning toward the latter.

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

Its clear this is not a fair fight. I dont fight cripples or midgets, and that includes mental midgets such as yourself.

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

Have you nothing to support you claim that Clinton didnt like NAFTA???? Just straight to the attempted insults??

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

That is a quote from MS Clinton, is name calling all you have to refute that??? You really have no other comment? That was your best huh??? Pretty lame. I am begining to feel a little sorry for ya Munster.

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

Creating a free trade zone in North America — the largest free trade zone in the world — would expand U.S. exports, create jobs and ensure that our economy was reaping the benefits, not the burdens, of globalization. Although unpopular with labor unions, expanding trade opportunities was an important administration goal."

BY THE WAY THAT WAS HILLARY CLINTON supporting her Hubby. Remember that when you campaign for Hillary in 2016

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

Clinton didnt like it he HAD to do it. WHAT A MAROON. Thats why he was on the stump promoting it right>??? Dang you are priceless.

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

More lame justification from the drooling socialist.

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

They may have asked for your moronic opinion but I ASSURE YOU, your dues money went to support a man that pushed NAFTA. Dont believe me??? Look up Clintons donations from your Union. Go ahead, dont be skeered. But you allready know that dont ya. I would be ashamed too if I were you.

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

Nevermind, I dont wish to hear more of your jingoistic NONSENSE>

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

Tell me why the Unions poured MILLIONS into Bill CLintons campaign as he supported and extended NAFTA which we were all against while I was a Steward and Union member.

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

There are MANY lies in your dogma Munster but you are eithet too dim or dishonest to admit them. The rank and file have NO control over the political contributions of the Union to parties and people that are AGAINST thier interest. That is just ONE example of your dishonesty.

Posted 420 days ago.

Tiredofit

But like all socialist your jingoistic propganda sounds better than the truth.

Posted 421 days ago.

Tiredofit

A non union shop is taken over by a Union by a 49 to 50 vote. The 49 percent went to work for a NON UNION SHOP and the tyranny of the majority took away thier choice. THIS IS WHEN THERE IS NO CHOICE. YET YOU REFUSE TO ADMIT THIS>

Posted 421 days ago.

BeRight

In the time it took you to write that a union shop would have had 2 coffee breaks and filed one grievance.

Posted 426 days ago.

Knowsbest

Yes, right to work for less !End the republican war on workers ! The whole of your arguement is that people dont have a choice RIGHT ?Well seems to me that if a person either chooses to work at A: a union shop or B: a non-union shop they are making a conscience choice ! SO EXACTLY HOW IS MAKING A CHOICE NOT A CHOICE !!

Posted 427 days ago.

Knowsbest

Well you can pump that line-o-malarky some where else ! A steward would know the rules ! And you obviously DONT ! I'm just glad you werent my steward , cause you'd spend all your time kissing your bosses keister and not doing your job ! And if that crap went on in your local again you werent doing your job ! So go flap your ignorant gums someplace else !

Posted 428 days ago.

Tiredofit

Munster, I was indeed a Steward in the IAM whether you choose to believe me or not. I really dont care. I saw from the inside what the Union was all about, and it aint hard work BRUTHA> Its about protecting the lowest amongst you and working down to the lowest standard set. Trivial BS designed to disrupt work for little more than the guys didnt feel like working that day. ALL TRUE, you can say liar liar all you like, but you were not there and I WAS. So Dim Wit. There ya have it.

Posted 428 days ago.

BeRight

In the time it took you to write that a union shop would have had 2 coffee breaks and filed one grievance.

Posted 428 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or