Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
32 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
BobDahler
#1

What happened to the "Union Influence in Politics" topic?

Even though I initiated it as the debut topic in the Times forums, I'm happy to realize it has been deleted. It died an ugly death long ago, and should have been executed long before it was. I'm curious though... Why? I am unaware of the travesty that occurred that was sufficiently heinous to warrant it's deletion... As compared to the tripe on ALL the other threads that is evident on a daily basis.

 
 

Member Comments

luvthesouth

R1KRA8...good morning and thanks for correcting the word "objective" for me. a terrible sinus headache has me a little under the weather today...but then again based on my spelling history, it could be just another normal day.

Posted 301 days ago.

luvthesouth

BobBarker...are all school administrators and boards republican as your blanket statement indicates? i find it odd that with every statement you make you have to slam the republicans..even if they are not there. they are your "boogie-man" aren't they?

Posted 301 days ago.

luvthesouth

abhor as much as you.."It is what it is".

Posted 301 days ago.

luvthesouth

BobDahler, good morning and i appreciate your reasoned perspective. one would think that the teacher unions with their history of protests would recognize the effect that they have on the "third rail" as you call them and not keep repeating the same activity that creates the "third rail" scenario. it is also in their capacity to not hinder any replacement educators so the children can continue in their school experience. that however is unlikely since it is a bargaining tool in which to make the public and administrators concede a hasty resolution. i think it is obvious that many do not choose to protest or vacate their classrooms when school is not in session and they are still under a pre-negotiated contract...which i think the administration would be crazy to sign if it had a walk-out clause. the game plan has always been and will always be to inflict as much pain to gain your obejectives. the unions have no qualms in doing just that. to use your phrase that i a

Posted 301 days ago.

BobDahler

lts: It is undeniable that children and the public are affected by union activity in the school systems, however: To characterize such actions as having the goal of holding the kids hostage for leverage in negotiations is a handy way to demonize unions, but ignores one very important fact. The kids are a "third rail" from a union's negotiating perspective, and every possible effort will be made to avoid placing them in a pawn's position.

Unlike industrial unions, the success of teachers' union activities is solely dependent on the public opinion (and funding) of them. The "roll out the hostages" tactic is generally promoted by negotiators on the other side of the table.

Posted 301 days ago.

luvthesouth

Tiredofit, good evening and nice to see you as well. i was disturbed by the actions of those that many on here herald as being so noble in their plight... but then again they never label others for the actions of a few.

Posted 302 days ago.

luvthesouth

BobBarker...can't see what you overlook.

Posted 302 days ago.

luvthesouth

simple honesty which you lack in defending teachers that use the children as pawns in their attempt to elevate their interests.

Posted 302 days ago.

luvthesouth

does using the word leverage make you feel better about hostage taking...then substitute it at will. means the same when involving some union activities. no need to swear....btw how do you justify teachers using children as bargaining tools in the unions attempt to enrich its memebers back-pocket? pretty good i would say since history bears out the truth.

Posted 302 days ago.

luvthesouth

BobB...as usual you have hijacked a great mans wording and twisted its meaning for your own purpose. the labor he was speaking of did not involve your hostage-taking locals but thouse that strive to advance based on their own labor as eveidenced when he said: “That some should be rich shows that others may become rich, and hence is just encouragement to industry and enterprise. Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another; but let him labor diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence built.” No that sounds like a true republican.

Posted 302 days ago.

moderation

I do seem to recall an anonymous poster alluding to an attempt by a union poster to become president/ business manager of a local union,only to be spurned in his/her attempt by his/her own membership.We can only wonder how that person feels about union influence today.

Posted 304 days ago.

moderation

Because they can't do it here.

Posted 304 days ago.

moderation

I can't believe working conditions alone would be what they are today, by simply counting on the good conscience of employers.We don't have to look far to see what American interests are doing in other parts of the globe.

Posted 304 days ago.

moderation

On those two local projects, the general contractor set the numbers for manning the different operations.

Posted 304 days ago.

moderation

This is all becoming an entry to our dossiers'.(-;

Posted 304 days ago.

moderation

I was assuming, when I should know better.

Posted 304 days ago.

moderation

Oh. Ok. Fluor?

Posted 304 days ago.

Caspiansynn

It was Cincinnati

Posted 304 days ago.

moderation

caspi- did you work at Waterford or Beverly ?

Posted 304 days ago.

Caspiansynn

It wasn't all bad though, it did help make me the person I am today.

Posted 304 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or