| Latest Post: Started By: Rank: Category Is the use of fake names and anonymous remarks by posters actually counter-productive to adult discussion of important national or state issues?While I understand that some posters feel the need for security because they might not want their employers or social contacts to know their views, it's possible that the overuse of such devices allows persons with a "bullying" mentality to thrive and possibly compromise intelligent discussion of these forum topics ... Do some (but not all) of these persons hide behind their fake identities like some southern "good ole boys" hid beneath K.K.K. hoods in order to lie, libel, threaten, or intimidate others? Is this a "problem"? Member CommentsmoderationKunec said-"How many people leave their homes in this country, every year, and run into the wrong person, never to be seen again"? And next says"How many of those folks ran into an "assault weapons" carrier? I venture to say "NONE". But they're dead.........." Well, there have been enough killed to suggest you may be skirting the facts.Even given an innocent ignorance of facts, your logic leaves the field. Posted 69 days ago. luvthesouthfred, Happy St. Patricks day to you and everyone on the forums! Posted 69 days ago. KunectdotsBUT THEN, there are those that will resort to logic. They will challenge you to compare the number of people that have been killed with (what you call) "assault weapons" in the entire history of the United States against the numbers of slaughtered civilians of country's who's leaders disarmed them, then decided they didn't 'like them' any longer. How many people leave their homes in this country, every year, and run into the wrong person, never to be seen again? h ttp://w ww.missingpersonsofamerica.c om/ How many of those folks ran into an "assault weapons" carrier? I venture to say "NONE". But they're dead and you bleeding-heart Liberals just want Obama not to have to suffer a rhetorical defeat. GOD knows, it could bring down his pathetic governance 'house of cards'! Posted 69 days ago. MunsterFrankly some will always seek to be "special " by claiming to be "abused, harassed, stalked, etc" , but the truth is they are just weak-minded and cant debate on a level playing field so they revert to the tactic of seeking sympathy with others by claiming they are being treated unfairly but thats just a cop out because they dont have anything valid to add without looking foolish! Posted 70 days ago. R1KRA8“ “ Dr. Phil's viewpoint: People only engage in repeated behavior if it pays off for them. ” ” . . . “ “ What is the pay-off for trolling? Experts and online discussions cite: Attention and recognition, even if negative, The emotional release of venting, Power (the power to disrupt), Vandalism, The thrill of breaking social conventions, Sabotaging groups the troll dislikes, Immaturity ” ” Why People Troll and How to Stop Them posted by Howard Fosdick (osnews) Posted 70 days ago. MunsterWrongriki , you are all that is wrong with things like these forums with your constant barrage of right -wing propaganda and bullsh^t ! Then complaining that your being picked on when all you post is debunked and refuted ! Since you insist on being the victim you should look that up on your right-wing websites !!When you persist in this mis-guided strategy of victimhood you should at least see if you qualify for a mental disability ! Posted 70 days ago. MunsterExactly dumbas$ ,“A "Forum Troll" is a person who posts outrageous message to provoke people to respond. The Forum Troll delights in sowing discord within a forum. A troll is someone who inspires flaming rhetoric, someone who is deliberately controversial, baiting and pulling people into a "flaming" discussion. Flaming discussions usually end with name calling, a flame war and at best a locked thread or in extreme cases a deleted thread.” Posted 70 days ago. R1KRA8““ Trolls divert online discussions into non-productive, off-topic venues. They pose as part of a community only to disrupt it. Trolling is anti-social behavior. ”” ““ Some of the techniques trolls use to accomplish their objectives are: Pithy put-downs, Name-calling and insults, Ad hominem attacks that try to negate an opinion by alleging negatives about the person supporting it, Impugning other's motives, Emotional rants, Bullying and harassment, Completely off-topic posts, Posting inaccurate "facts" ””
Why People Troll and How to Stop Them
posted by Howard Fosdick Posted 70 days ago. MunsterWrongriki , you are all that is wrong with things like these forums with your constant barrage of right -wing propaganda and bullsh^t ! Then complaining that your being picked on when all you post is debunked and refuted ! Since you insist on being the victim you should look that up on your right-wing websites !!When you persist in this mis-guided strategy of victimhood you should at least see if you qualify for a mental disability ! Posted 70 days ago. MunsterSo your also in denial about them having a choice ?? When you pick either !: UNION or 2: NON UNION your are in fact choosing !!!Please explain that their choice isnt a choice !!!And again !Thats not what this is about ! You guy dont really give a crap about some joe blow , you just want to keep unions from donating to democrats ! "right to work is wrong". c om Posted 70 days ago. MunsterFrankly some will always seek to be "special " by claiming to be "abused, harassed, stalked, etc" , but the truth is they are just weak-minded and cant debate on a level playing field so they revert to the tactic of seeking sympathy with others by claiming they are being treated unfairly but thats just a cop out because they dont have anything valid to add without looking foolish! Posted 70 days ago. R1KRA8“when i wrote "hopefully things may settle out and you can continue to post your thoughts without the bitter responses that you get." i was wrong.” . . . . . “frankly some will always be protected and allowed to do as they wish. i strongly suggest you and others wear out the report abuse link until it either gets results or just post what they post and change whom it is directed toward. then you will find out if there is truly selective favoritism associated with this site.” ~ luvthesouth NEPOTISM 1: favoritism (as in appointment to a job)based on kinship NEXUS 1: connection, link; also : a causal link 2: a connected group or series (merriam-webster) Posted 70 days ago. MunsterSo your also in denial about them having a choice ?? When you pick either !: UNION or 2: NON UNION your are in fact choosing !!!Please explain that their choice isnt a choice !!!And again !Thats not what this is about ! You guy dont really give a crap about some joe blow , you just want to keep unions from donating to democrats ! "right to work is wrong". c om Posted 71 days ago. R1KRA8Hey, movie fans . . . There is a real movie titled . . . MONSTURD. By 4321 Films Posted 71 days ago. Munster"right to work is wrong".co m This is typical when wrongriki cant back up a lie ! Remember , deny deflect and lie !! And the usual crap that its being "bullied"Oh and lest we forget , now its being "stalked" ! what an absolute pitiful putz !!LOLOLO "right to work is wrong".co m Posted 71 days ago. R1KRA8“If you get the sense that the person may try to stalk you offline, call your local police immediately!”
Understanding The Cyberharassment Problem
by Parry Aftab
“Parry Aftab is a cyberspace lawyer, specializing in online privacy and security law, and she's also executive director of WiredSafety.”
w I r e d c o p s . o r g Posted 71 days ago. Post a Comment |