Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
75 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
armycorp
#1

Benghazi

Nothing seems to add up in this Ambassador Stevens murder. Orders to stand down. Poor security on 911. Could Stevens have been sacrified as an eye for an eye for taking out Bin Laden with the Muslim radicals? What do you think?

 
 

Member Comments

luvthesouth

two and just admit that Obama and his appointee's lied!

Posted 760 days ago.

luvthesouth

munster...lets talk about it. lay it out for us. the evidence( our own and allies) was laid out for the u.n. security council as well as our own congress. remember, the same evidence was provided to republicans and democrats alike. in addition, the reason for going into iraq was not solely limited to just weapons of mass detruction. read the resolution approved by congress. based on your definition of combat weapons and weapons of mass destruction, saddam hussein certainly had them. a little research into the inventory that was logged by u.n. inspectors and the subsequent missing inventory without verifiable reasons would indicate that something was amiss with the discrepancy. even you should recognize that there is a vast difference between providing false information that you don't know is false verses giving information that you "know" is false. you do know the difference don't you??? if you did, you would not be trying to make your asinine point in trying to compare the

Posted 760 days ago.

luvthesouth

good afternoon moderation. i would have hoped if i had been in his position that i would not have lied to the american people whom i serve. nor would i have instructed others to lie for me. to curb the ultimate shame of the truth of my lie, i would not have continued to tell it long after the truth was revealed as he did. if you have followed my posts regarding this subject, the timeline that i presented was not be critical of the response or lack thereof, but to indicate that the C.I.C. knew the thruth from the get-go and blatantly lied to the american people. considering the timeline and the subsequent testimony of credible sources, the lie is a fact. period. like the alcoholic, until you admit to the truth there is no healing. if you still would like a complete "what if" scenario, then i will address it in another post. i think it would be futile, but i will entertain your request to clear your mind.

Posted 760 days ago.

moderation

Hey Cap'n.

Posted 760 days ago.

moderation

good morning, lts- if you don't mind, and,so at least I can be clear, what would you have done, as potus, to expedite a defensive action and evacuation plan, in reaction to the initial report of the attack on the Benghazi compound?

Posted 760 days ago.

BeRight

Scapile, In the Bush years, a terrorist attack was recognized for what it was. During this administration, they confused a protest with a terrorist attack. This is the heart of what is Benghazi. Where they that naïve or was there a cover up? Jerk.

Posted 763 days ago.

scrappile

... It's a clever rhetorical twist to equate support for due process with support for slavery, but it's a complete non-sequitur. Mr. Bolton never answered my question, and so it seems he's quite comfortable with the idea of a single man deciding who lives and dies, without any restraint or judicial review. The president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces, not God."

Posted 764 days ago.

scrappile

This may not be the place for this, but it seems members of past administrations have no problem with our govt. targeting citizens, and no jurice prudence or due process need to exist....During the Q&A, Skeptical Libertarian editor Daniel Bier asked Bolton, “If YOU were identified as a threat by some nameless official in the administration, would YOU want due process?” Bolton retorted that the government was right to kill thousands of Americans during the Civil War without due process, and (after being jeered by the crowd) accused libertarians of "discrediting their movement" by "defending the Confederacy."

In a later interview, Bier responded to Bolton's statement: "It's ludicrous to compare the deliberate assassination of a 16-year-old American citizen, who is not engaged in hostilities against the United States, who has never been charged with a crime, and was in a neutral country, with shooting back at Confederate soldiers on a battlefield.

... It's

Posted 764 days ago.

luvthesouth

scrappile, upon review of your posted claims i found that unfortunately nine americans were listed as killed out of the 60 dead. while no one likes for anyone to die...with relatively few exceptions on my part, during the bush years the attacks were dutifully reported with accurate descriptions and details without the assistance of real-time audio and video. what galls me and seemingly most complainants is the fact of a lie and subsequent attempted cover-up by this administration and its representatives. this example of deception should be disturbing whether you are republican, democrat or anything in between.

Posted 764 days ago.

scrappile

U. S Embassy and Consulate Attacks under George W. Bush: Jan. 22, 2002-------U.S. Consulate at Kolkata: 5 killed, June 14, 2002: U.S. Consulate at Karachi: 12 killed---------Feb. 28, 2003: U.S. Embassy at Islambad: 2 killed------------June 30, 2004: U.S. Embassy at Tashkent: 2 killed----------Dec. 6, 2002: U.S. Compound at Saudi Arabia: 9 killed--------Mar. 2, 2006: U.S. Consulate in Karachi: 2 killed----------Sept. 12, 2006: U.S. Embassy at Syria: 4 killed-------Mar. 18, 2008: U.S. Embassy at Yemen: 2 killed--------------July 9, 2008: U.S. Consulate at Istanbul: 6 killed------------------Sept. 17, 2008: U.S. Embassy at Yemen, 16 killed. TOTAL DEATHS: 60---OUTRAGED REPUBLICANS: 0

Posted 764 days ago.

luvthesouth

munster, your hollow accusations of racism as the reason why people may disagree with President Obama is getting old, tiresome and offensive. please stop. F.Y.I. i only have a problem with the white half of him. the black half doesn't bother me at all.( a note to the sensisitive folks that read these posts....the last sentence was sarcasm directed toward munster)

Posted 769 days ago.

snake021

The night Bin Laden was taken out, we have pictures of the Admin in the "war room" with looks of concern, shock, and worry on their faces, watching from start to finish. Then the Prez went immediately to the press to announce his greatness of leadership in authorizing and coordinating the mission.

Benghazi- The great leader said "Do what ya can, keep me posted"? He's not a POTUS, he's a POS.

Posted 772 days ago.

luvthesouth

Longtime readers know I have no lost love for John Brennan. I think he is a dangerous, incompetent. I think he should be prevented from becoming the head of the CIA. expressed by Larry Johnson in your quoted rebuttal. do you agree?

Posted 774 days ago.

luvthesouth

thank you for your clarification and the conversation.

Posted 778 days ago.

moderation

lts- we had a discussion earlier about what info you or I may be entitled initially, and in real time,as a national security issue unfolds. yes, I am aware there was a CIA presence. That was the purpose of that satellite compound, No? the near -site response was just that, responding to the alarm. they dispatched themselves to the compound, but ultimately, required the assistance of the unit dispatched from tripoli to secure the situation to a point where they were capable of more than just defensive actions. the fact that their weaponry was limited tohandguns is alarming,yet amazing in that they were as effective as could be imagined.

Posted 778 days ago.

luvthesouth

"The president is well-informed about what is going on; make no mistake about it." i will take him at his word...will you?

Posted 779 days ago.

luvthesouth

moderation, i do not understand what point you are trying to make. what exactly is it? i just read what panetta said....please note that he was referring to a military response team. if you would read my post again you will notice that it referenced a CIA team that was dispatched prior. remember the CIA was there from the beginning. correct me if i am wrong, but does the CIA not keep the president informed through proper channels? do you not think that the attack on a consulate facility would warrant pertinent and accurate information to be sent to our president as soon as possible? if not then we have a much bigger problem than simply the perpetration of a lie, no matter the reason. as far as the credibility of panetta goes, he is an appointee and from what i have seen from a few of his previous appointees, they will and have said anything for their boss. however, i will accept his statement regarding the military response. to quote your credible source.."Panetta said forcefully

Posted 779 days ago.

moderation

lts- panetta said it was roughly 3 hrs. for a response team deployed from tripoli to be on site, at which time they came under the mortar fire that claimed the last two lives of the Stevens group. there were locals who assisted, and attempted to assist our countrymen up to that point in time. Do you consider panetta credible ?

Posted 779 days ago.

moderation

stiff, must you ALWAYS be so belligerent ?

Posted 779 days ago.

luvthesouth

moderation, you may wish to read what i posted again which will answer your question. i stated that i beleved that he, as president was properly briefed on the situation from the beginning. so either he and others in his administration intentionally mislead the american people or he was derelict in his duties of being commander-in-chief by either ignoring or dismissing credible information being relayed to him. i will state again for you and everyone else. he was told correctly and promptly what the situation was. so he and others flat out lied ...for what reason.... i do not know. please post if you have credible and verifiable information to the contrary.

Posted 779 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or