Support the NRA AND GOA
It wont pass folks but they wont quit trying, little bite at a time
Yeah you stand on that soapbox and rant , but where was that outrage when Reagun did it ?
Shall not be infringed. Support the NRA
So the difference is Reagun proposed one and Obama proposed another . What exactly would be the difference ?
Shall not be infringed
Support the NRA clearly these socialist morons want to take your liberties
So what changed ? Your ability to perceive ?
Now the story changes. Lol it will not pass
And one more time , they arent banning all guns ! Just military assault weapons and their clones and certain other qualifiers ! Your favorite shotgun is safe and no one is losing any "rights" ! And beside the "patriot act"is much more of an "intrusion" on ones rights , and there is little to no crying about that from you patriots !
Well of course Absolem and the hollow point in your 357 is designed tk expand quickly and deliver all its energy into the target. Idiots dont understand that guns are made to kill, there are no nice ones.
OWO...while you feel you have been ordained to educate the ignorant, one must have skipped the classes on effective communication and social interaction. a better way of communicating your point can be just as effective. no oe much cares for the thought of losing a right or ablility to enjoy at ones leisure. that is the problem that many have wih intrusions. the end result as seen by many is an undue burden placed on the citizen. we all give up certain rights to "feel" safe. every distatseful action can beachieved in another fashion or form. much like the virus mutates, the adatability and ingenuity of man will devise another tool to effectly create the desired result. ball bearings do terrible damage....shall we all switch to roller?...oops...well they might tumble....quite the stumbling block.
I'm just telling the ignorant the info !There is a difference and if we can keep some nutjob from getting their hands on one we will be better for it. It still holds true that no civilian needs a military assault weapon ! And pervert troll , just take a little time and do some research !
Shop...sorry about the name misspelling.
Shoop...good afternoon my friend. that could be him saying the laws do not address that particular concern in any law being pressented. i'll admit that the tumbling bullet does much more tissue damage than a straight through shot. although, "what does it matter" if it's a clean kill shot either
Oh ok Fluffy show me in the gun ban where it addresses your yawing bullets lol it doesnt
OWO...there is no argument that the ak-47 or any weapon can be a nasty thing in the hands of the wrong person. that leads us up to the discussion of the future of passive gun control and the ultimate shift of absolute control to the federal government.
The difference is abby , yeah you can kill someone with a model 70 , but if you want to be mean and efficiant and cause horrific wounds you'll use a AK-74 !
since i am not a gun guy...i'll take a stab(pun intended) at it. winchester 70 rifle verses AK-47 rifle. yep look different, originally designed with arguably different target(s) in mind....the 70 is not modifiable to full-auto...i assume. that may make the most difference outside of cosmetics, calibre, and capacity....i am leaving out engineering specifics such as muzzle velocity...etc..
And coaldust , you just move on through , you wouldnt understand it anyway, but be near when the perverted troll needs you to say "good point" ! OK ?
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121