Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by absolem
BeRight
#1

Barack Obama Legacy

BBB

 
 

Member Comments

Kunectdots

absolem - I also failed to point out that, if we rid ourselves of every detainee in custody at Gitmo, the financial savings impact to the American public will not be significant.

The "employees" stationed there will just be moved to other duties throughout the world.

Where's ohwiseone's snide remarks like I'm "thinking like a Republican businessman"?

Posted 50 days ago.

absolem

Originally should have been between 2-3%. But I expanded the number of decimal places during the calculation which changed to 3%.

Posted 51 days ago.

absolem

Oddly enough, the cost of operating gitmo just happens to almost equal the amount of additional funds that the president promised to Jordan. The total amount that will be given is between 3% of Jordans total gdp.

Posted 51 days ago.

Kunectdots

Obama's supporters want to close down Guantanamo using the costs of it's operation as a supporting reason. All the while they leave out the factor that we are currently paying the same 2000 U.S. employees to guard/service one-fourth of the total number of prisoners that the same number of employees used to guard/service.

It would seem a good business strategy to have reduced the number of employees, proportionately, to the number of detainees. It's effect would have defused the claim that each one of the prisoners costs us X-amount of million dollars per year to detain.

But those kinds of moves would have offset a portion of Obama's argument to close up the place. OH WHAT A STRATEGIST HE IS!

Posted 51 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Nah , It the level of ignorance that sets Rush apart from your everyday dimwit republidud !

Posted 52 days ago.

BeRight

You seem to have a thing with peoples looks

Posted 53 days ago.

Ohwiseone

No, it was El Lardass !And just so you know that's Rush Limbaughs pet name !

Posted 53 days ago.

BeRight

I remember a few libs on this site using a term Lard A s s .

Posted 53 days ago.

BeRight

You forgot Debbie (poodle hair) Wasserman Schultz

Posted 53 days ago.

NasCarNut

 looks like her brother Rachel Maddow.

You seem to have a thing with peoples looks, first Hillary now Rachel...just one of these two women are smarter than both of us put together...I bet your looks are Perfect eh...

Posted 53 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ah, a conversation you say , sound more like idiotic chattering to me !

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

BERIGHT, do you notice anyone desperately trying to insert themselves into every conversation but being largely ignored???? Pretty sad isn't it?

Posted 53 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ah yes the nit picker deluxe ! I guess if that's all you got , you might as well use it ! What an absolute fool ! By the way , there still is NO IAW LOCAL ANYWHERE NEAR HERE !

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

(your the) SHOULD BE (YOU'RE the) LOLOLOL

Who are you calling stupid?

Posted 53 days ago.

Ohwiseone

That's right , your the perfect example of that !

Posted 53 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Politi-fact and pundit-fact may have a roll in this !

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

ya cant fix stupid

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

You are most likely correct BERIGHT

Posted 53 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Should we compare ratings on how factual both are ?

Posted 53 days ago.

BeRight

Stllhere....no problem. They won't believe is anyway until it comes form MSNBC from Ed Schultz or the girl who looks like her brother Rachel Maddow.

Posted 53 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or