If the republican congress thwarthed a by partisan bill very popular amongst the electorate, would that be obstructionist>>>>?? Well of course Obama cannot be obstructionist, he knows what we NEED not what we WANT
"Where were all the anti- Keystone people when the first portion , Phase one, was commissioned since 2010? No one was worried about the landowners then." No one but the landowners.
Where were all the anti- Keystone people when the first portion , Phase one, was commissioned since 2010? No one was worried about the landowners rights then. The proposed Keystone XL Pipeline (Phase IV), would essentially duplicate the Phase I pipeline between Hardisty, Alberta, and Steele City, Nebraska, with a shorter route and a larger-diameter pipe. It would run through Baker, Montana, where American-produced light crude oil from the Williston Basin (Bakken formation) of Montana and North Dakota would be added. This pipe line would carry BOTH Canadian and US Oil. In regards to Obama’s claim the all the oil would be exported, the Washington Post's Fact Checker gave it three out of four Pinocchios for inaccuracy, noting that the best evidence is that "at least half" the oil would remain here.
The veto was expected. Let the lying stop.
I was sure that Obama would be being branded and OBSTRUCTIONIST on these very pages, hmmmmm but no.
One consideration, among several, is that the land owners/farmers would lose their power to influence the situation, if this bill were to be signed by the potus.
Yeah , leave up to you republiduds(and the Kochs) and we all would have oil derricks in our front yard !
Talk about living up to the President's name Oblabla:"The presidential power to veto legislation is one I take seriously," Obama said in his veto message to the Senate. "But I also take seriously my responsibility to the American people. And because this act of Congress conflicts with established executive branch procedures and cuts short thorough consideration of issues that could bear on our national interest — including our security, safety, and environment — it has earned my veto."
Why just not say the environmentalists had me by the short hairs.
Even the USA Today called him an idiot for this veto.
More like 'understanding, compassionate, Liberal' ohwiseone doesn't want any contradictory viewpoints revealed that run counter to his. Ahhhh, they're such an accommodating group, right up to the one that sits at their top tier in DC.
OWO...you posted: "Truth sometimes is uncomfortable for those who need to hear it ! That's life , get over it !" personally i think we all need to make life better, the problem is getting everyone to agree on "better".
Truth sometimes is uncomfortable for those who need to hear it ! That's life , get over it !
Oh. Than the following is comment on the message and not an attacke on the messenger?: you and the troll spouting those right wing horsesh^t talking points its almost like listening to El Lardass himself".
Well, I am glad we got that cleared up.
There is no attack , just trying to get you to see ! Things aren't always the way faux tells you !Trusting that source , you lose !
When you attack the messenger and not the message, you lose.
And bewrite , between you and the troll spouting those right wing horsesh^t talking points its almost like listening to El Lardass himself ! Why don't you look and see what the socialist party has to say about the president? Just another label em and blame em tactic from you republizombies !
Again what you fail to realize is sometimes its a fight to just get basic human dignity ! Of course you have never been in that position ! Sometimes the ends justify the needs ! I guess it comes down to some making a war of it and anythings fair in war !
BeRight - That last posting of yours was par excellence and deserving of some savoring.
I'm certain that the usual low-info contributors here will try to put some distance between it and their contorted ramblings with some inane, irrelevant points of view, as is their typical strategy.
Think about it! Who's doing the math? John Battaglia Southport
I thought this was interesting: Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America : 1. America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized. 2. Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims. 3. They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government. 4. Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer. 5. The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about. 6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about - Yet they want America to be more like those other countries.
OWO...that's like saying i don't support beating my wife, just that sometimes it's necessary. unbelievable....slapping palm on forehead.
I never said I supported it , just that sometimes its necessary !
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121