Of course not Beright nor could we tell if you were a deviant of aome sort. Thats the problem
Gotta love how quickly the republinutz switched this crap from being a "religious freedom " bill to one of "where can I pee" bill ! Both are losers but the shift was truely amazing !
If I stood in front of you, could you tell by looking at me?
That would seem to be one of the big questions.
Do we put a tag on a trans so they can go and use the women's room or do we just trust?
Why are you trans-gender ?
Please let me know when Loretta Lynch and the Feds decide on where I can pee.
It seems pretty easy but not when the feds get involved.
If you are a guy, trying walking into a women's room at the Great American Ball park and see what happens.
And doofus , citing almost anything from a semi-credible source sometimes works but you just cant abide by that , you've got to dig into your own personal pile of bullsh^t propaganda to get your little nuggets of dumbassery .And even then you'll mis-interpret what was written to satisfy your need to mis-lead .
Dis conect your hilarious !" Well, Obama & CO. have determined that Mr. John Doe is no longer capable of handling his financial affairs " And yet your republinutz appoint "emergency managers " to side step the legal lawfully elected local officals and insert their own draconian measures .That has worked out so well, Flint comes to mind here , and we all know what a success that was !
The Social Security administration lays out five specific criteria for recipients they plan to add to NICS. Those the agency plans to target must have filed a disability claim, been determined to be disabled because of a mental impairment, been officially diagnosed as mentally impaired, between the ages of 18 and 65, and have been assigned a representative payee because they were found by Social Security to be incapable of managing their benefit payments.
For those of you too LAZY to look up these sources OR always wanting to discredit the message by killing the messenger, like stinky, here's an excerpt from The Seattle Time's opinion.
"The administration is pushing to ban Social Security beneficiaries from owning guns if they lack the mental capacity to manage their own affairs, which could affect MILLIONS of people whose monthly disability payments are handled by others."
Don't like the Washington Free Beacon's version of the story?
OK, here's the same scoop from The Los Angeles Times.
"Obama pushes to extend gun background checks to Social Security"
h ttp://w ww.latimes.c om/nation/politics/la-na-gun-law-20150718-story.html
How about one from The Seattle Times?
"Obama goal: no guns for some on Social Security disability"
h ttp://w ww.seattletimes.c om/nation-world/obama-goal-no-guns-for-some-on-social-security-disability/
~ "found by Social Security to be incapable of managing their benefit payments." ???
So how many of the shooting deaths is that particular demographic responsible for on the streets of Chicago. or anywhere else for that matter?
I see it as just another niche effort by government Gun-grabbers to infringe upon the 2nd Amendment PRIVILEGES of some of America's least defensible citizenry.
HEY, MR. DRUG USER; Need a big screen TV or some nice jewelry to hock for some drug money? Well, Obama & CO. have determined that Mr. John Doe is no longer capable of handling his financial affairs and THEREFORE he can no longer possess a gun with which to defend himself from you. Easy pickins boys.
The Washington Free Beacon is an American web site that publishes news and associated content. It states it is "dedicated to uncovering the stories that the powers that be hope will never see the light of day" ..... The Atlantic's Conor Friedersdorf called the Free Beacon's stated mission "decadent and unethical
ha ha...and some wonder what's wrong with this country...and they vote!!...smh
North Caroline: Barack legacy may come down to an executive order telling people where they can p e e and c r a p.
A fitting end so to speak.
not at all what this article is about...it's about people who are so mentally ill that they are collecting disability benefits based on their mental illness and not being allowed to own guns...
Never mind there was no due process, we are screwed if those people gain power
Shouldn't surprise anyone, remember the attempt to strip those on the "no fly list" of gun rights? The left lemmings clapped like seals
'Obama Admin Works to Keep Guns From Many on Social Security Disability - NRA calls the effort 'embarrassing and shameful'
“The Social Security Administration’s proposal doesn’t require an individual to be adjudicated mentally defective or to pose a risk to himself or others,” Lars Dalesiede, a NRA spokesman, said. “Instead they are set to strip away your constitutional rights just because you meet a set of criteria established by a group of faceless bureaucrats you’ll never meet. That puts thousands of Americans in the terrible position of choosing whether to pay their bills or give up their constitutional rights.”
The group called the president’s push for the new rule “embarrassing and shameful.”
h ttp://freebeacon.c om/issues/obama-admin-works-keep-guns-many-social-security-disability/
And when youre booted you'll still be the pervert troll !
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121