The SC gave the election to Bush before they knew the definite results of the election in Florida. Of course the SC also said that the Florida SC was wrong in doing a recount and called it unconstitutional.
I am really confused as always: First you talk about the Supreme court giving the election to Bush. I clarified what the SC was deciding. I make a comment on the E-college and you say Gore got more votes nationwide. First you discuss Florida and then you talk about the popular vote nationwide. Maybe you don’t know how the E-College works. As we found out you can get the most of the popular votes, but to win the election you need the E-college majority.
You have always been a fountain of misinformation, beright.And, so jealous of a certain 'do'.
"..they all concluded that Bush got the votes and maintained the lead."
I see a whole lot of blabber but no facts.
"Bush got the Electoral College because he got the most votes in Florida."
You are confused about the topic. The facts stand that Gore did get more votes in the nation than Bush.
"You should relax, your guy.."
I am perfectly relaxed...having the facts makes one relaxed. My guy? You mean Mccain? Because that's who I voted for.
Nice try on the Gore deal but the media did a complete anal examine of the vote count in Florida and they all concluded that Bush got the votes and maintained the lead. The Supreme Court simply said that the Democrats could not change the rules in the middle of the game. Bush got the Electoral College because he got the most votes in Florida. You should relax, your guy is doing a bang up job. He put us in the shXXtter just like he planned.
"Gitmo detainees? Let them rot in hell."
Sic semper tyrannis
And people wonder why the world calls us hypocrites.
Sorry Beright but Gore got more votes. Even if it wasn't true...the Supreme Court still gave it to Bush. They were not going by popular vote.
Please...a person tried to call a US citizen, one Barack Obama, that clearly won the election an occupier. I simply gave a better example of what an occupier would be.
Get a clue...get a clue...oh for heaven's sake get a freakin clue...
Gitmo detainees? Let them rot in hell.
You must have missed the reports from all the left winger papers and news organizations who reluctantly concluded that after all their investigations that Bush got more votes the Gore.
Let it go…..let it go…….let it go………….
"occupier of the whitehouse"
You mean Bush? I'm just saying that after the 2000 election where the Supreme Court handed him the Presidency...Bush is more of an occupier than Obama.
And please, let's not be like the people at Fox News. At least let the US Soldier get back to the states before you crucify him. We know very little facts involved with this and a lot of speculation.
The thing that bugs me the most is that for all the whiners about letting the Gitmo people go, not one person has gave an idea of what we should do with them. No one wants to put them on trial and charge them with anything but yet you don't want to let them go. What does it say about our American iseals if we hold someone forever without trial?
It is absolutely mindboggling that people still stand up for this occupier of the whitehouse after he has traded a deserter for 5 taliban bad guys by bypassing congress with an E.O.
Political retribution? Arizona said Friday it will rush federal supplies to a holding center housing migrant children — among the thousands being sent to the state by the federal government from Texas.
The Homeland Security Department started flying immigrants to Arizona from the Rio Grande Valley in Texas last month after the number of immigrants, including more than 48,000 children traveling on their own, overwhelmed the Border Patrol there.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said many of the immigrants are being bused to Tucson and Phoenix, then released. Homeland Security confirmed some immigrants were released and told to report to an ICE office near where they were traveling within 15 days. But federal authorities have not said how many have been released.
I find it humorous that the Rigth leaning factions on our nation cannot ever be happy with a Democrat President. Obama raises our Debt...it's bad. Clinton lowered our Debt and it was bad.
Kun- you are under the impression that I don't think Obama has lied or misinformed people about things. I am quite certain he has. Every President does it for varying reasons. Sadly, time makes liars out of every President. Whether it's Bush and Iraq's WMDs or Obama and keeping one's insurance. They all lie or show their ignorance at some point.
The problem I have is this desire to infuse Obama's Presidency with something sinister. It's never, "Obama's lied like a typical politician". It's more like, "Obama lied because he is up to something."
The facts are, Obama has not taken our weapons. Obama will leave in 2017. The other branches of govt have not overruled him. Obama has not converted America in a Socialistic nation or make it Muslim.
You ignored my question, "I am curious, what could the President and Congress cut that couldn't be considered a weakening by someone in the nation?"
Honestly, any cuts could hurt someone in the nation or be used by those seeking political points to say it's hurting someone.
"YES, Obama's cuts to NASA did weaken this nation."
You do realize that the Space Shuttle Program was only suppose to last 15 years. Many Presidents allowed the program to continue but never pushed for a new program to replace it. President Bush was the one that pushed for it's final retirement. So in the end, it's hardly all Obama's fault that we fell behind in developing a new space shuttle program.
FYI - Remember the glory days of THE LIARS presidency? His funding program for "shovel ready jobs" (that fell on it's face) was going to be high tidings.
Check out the website about the money spent amongst the fifty states on projects for NASA (you know - the ones you're touting about Obama cutting).
Seems like he's killed more shovel-WORKING jobs with his NASA cutbacks.
h ttp://e n.wikipedia.o rg/wiki/File:NASA_dollars.jpg
You're asking the wrong guy about his "his cuts in NASA". Ask Vladamir Putin what he thinks of "did those weaken the nation"? We now have to pay Vlad The Impaler $4,000,000 per US astronaut to be transported to the ISS. I wonder how that relationship will fare in light of Putin's take over of Crimea?
OH WAIT! I forgot. I'm talking to a stone (must keep it simple) so; YES, Obama's cuts to NASA did weaken this nation.
"has shown no propensity to cut back on any federal spending (except that which weakens this country)"
I did mention his cuts in NASA, did those weaken the nation? I am curious, what could the President and Congress cut that couldn't be considered a weakening by someone in the nation?
"I can speculate, through LOGIC.."
Through fear you mean. It's the same type of fear that made people think the President was going to take away everyone's guns and that never happened. It's the same fear that he was going to try and make America into a nation bowing down to Islam.
All I see from you is a Conspiracist.
In 2017, Obama will step down. There is no reason to think otherwise. There is certainly no rational or logical reason to think he will not.
Look at the real world, do you honestly think the citizens of the US would let a President become a tyrant without raising arms against him? Do you really think that our military would allow Obama to do that? If you do, then there is little hope for you.
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121