Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
65 days ago.
by BeRight
Valveguy
#1

Obamacare is not "FREE" health care

People have finally realized that the word “free” is nowhere to be found in Obamacare’s “ Affordable Health Care Act”. Coverage under President Barack Obama's health care law won't be cheap. A study released Thursday by the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation found that government tax credits would lower the sticker price on a benchmark "silver" policy to a little over $190 a month for single people making about $29,000, regardless of their age. For uninsured people who are paying nothing today, this is still a big cost that they're expected to fit into their budgets.

 
 

Member Comments

thegreek

Democrats Turning on Each Other Over Obamacare Friday, 14 Feb 2014 10:30 AM

By Lisa Barron

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax . com

Posted 164 days ago.

thegreek

A law that Barry has already broke numerous times.!!

Posted 164 days ago.

thegreek

Yipee kay yeaa.

Posted 164 days ago.

thegreek

Yabba dabba dooo.

Posted 164 days ago.

thegreek

We shoulda seen that coming LTS. Sign up, no pay. That is the nature of those beasts that voted democratic anyhow. Freebies..

Posted 164 days ago.

luvthesouth

the new american ethic... from yahoo finance: Up to one-fifth of people who signed up for insurance under Obamacare aren't paying. the next bailout. screw the deduction cause i ain't even paying the premium! gosh i love it...too easy.

Posted 165 days ago.

luvthesouth

moderation....yes. it does as long as there is gravity without obstacles to impede its movement. the democrats are learning that sometimes when you think you have gotten rid of your poop...it comes back. gravity is then...not your friend. 8-)

Posted 165 days ago.

luvthesouth

moderation, in a macro sense of the word consumer, everything by law that we are responsible for is traced back to that point. the difference being you as a consumer do not make a direct payment nor was the war declared a law, but your chosen deductable is a payment made exclusively by you and is a law. either way, the question still remains unanswered by your chiming-in-shadow as to how those are expected to pay the deductable when they did not prove to be financacially willing to even have the insurance prior to the law. i am somewhat (not really) stunned as to the association of the recent military excursions (we did not declare war) from both of you when i, as a conservative republican, question the part of the law that causes harm against those that the democrats profess such concern. that part of the law is like harming a woman while you profess to be saving her from her abusive partner.

Posted 165 days ago.

moderation

Poop still runs downhill, doesn't it?

Posted 165 days ago.

moderation

"Paid for by the consumer "

Posted 165 days ago.

luvthesouth

*policy

Posted 165 days ago.

luvthesouth

good morning moderation...i am in energy-saving mode this morning. why not be a dear and outline in what ways they are the same method in relation to the poilicy holders deductable.

Posted 165 days ago.

moderation

good morning, lts- it's basically the same method, is it not?

Posted 165 days ago.

luvthesouth

*republicans...sorry i am not wearing my "sherman" glasses at the moment. 8-)

Posted 166 days ago.

luvthesouth

BobBarker...what is there to consider???...please provide the missing link between your rambling on about the war and the pitfalls of the A.C.A....is it just because you are peeved that the republicnas "WON'T" save the dems behinds and force them to stew in their own steaming pile of poo?

Posted 166 days ago.

luvthesouth

that. the irony that i was getting at, that he seemed to miss, is the law that was created to help the poor and middle-class will financially do the opposite in respect to the deductable. as i said i allowed myself to veer off course and go down a path of lunacy. i have changed direction.

Posted 166 days ago.

luvthesouth

good morning moderation. i hope you already know the answer to your question..but like i said to BobBarker...what does that have to do with the out-of-pocket deductable that those with the mandated health insurance have to pay. is there a provision in the A.C.A. that directs the same sort of financing for the deductables that i and most americans are not aware of? he stated he doesn't know and immediately went off on some tangent that had absolutely nothing to do with the conversation except to dredge up his dislike of the past administration when the discussion, at least in my mind, centered around the topic of healthcare. now if wanted to make the stretch of saying that all of that money was planned to have been borrowed and used for healthcare and not the wars...then fine...make that statement of fact. the problem is...there was zero plan to borrow money to pay for the healthcare law....it is a tax...that's how it was passed. it is not a spending resolution. although it will become

Posted 166 days ago.

moderation

lts- what was to method used to pay for the middle east actions?

Posted 167 days ago.

thegreek

You may often come across a situation where you have to deal with a closed-minded person. This can be at your workplace, in your daily life, or even at home. Persuading such people to change their opinions and making them open to accept new ideas is quite a challenging task. Communication with a person who is closed-minded often causes undesirable conflict in the two conversing entities. In fact, interaction with a closed-minded person can be a real test of your patience and persuasive skills. In this Buzzle article we have provided some tips that will help you deal with these people in an effective way. Let us first understand what characterizes a closed-minded person

Posted 167 days ago.

luvthesouth

O.K?????....well that sure does answer my simple question. so how much did i say the democrats borrowed to finance the A.C.A. the same way the wars were financed? i am sorry i just about got vacuumed (nice version of the word i desired to use) into a strange parallel universe of a conversation with you. i fear i may have to pull the ripcord and bail out of this discussion. you are conversing in a tangent that should trail off into the wild blue yonder. i think the Olympics may be on now. take care.

Posted 167 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or