Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
23 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
Valveguy
#1

Obamacare is not "FREE" health care

People have finally realized that the word “free” is nowhere to be found in Obamacare’s “ Affordable Health Care Act”. Coverage under President Barack Obama's health care law won't be cheap. A study released Thursday by the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation found that government tax credits would lower the sticker price on a benchmark "silver" policy to a little over $190 a month for single people making about $29,000, regardless of their age. For uninsured people who are paying nothing today, this is still a big cost that they're expected to fit into their budgets.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

Troll on the warpath , everyone look out ! Dipweeds like the lying troll here are so eaten up with the right-wing propaganda and bullsh&t they will reach for anything to demonize those who dont agree with them !

Posted 23 days ago.

Stillhere

But that speaks to the hypocrisy of the left, whether they are Hollywood morons who make millions pretending to be someone else, or ultra rich like Soros or dare I say, HILLARY (wasn't she dead broke?)

Posted 23 days ago.

Stillhere

It was very amusing to see Michael (jabba) Moore at the Occupy socialist rally, those idiots don't realize his IS the 1%.

Posted 23 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ah yes the ole "name em and blame em bullsh^t " from the lying troll ! Good little nazi that !

Posted 23 days ago.

Stillhere

They like to decide how much of anything someone "needs" and if its more than they have, its too much. That is unless the party is question sings from the socialist hymnal like Soros, Algore Michael Jabba the hut Moore etc.

Posted 23 days ago.

Stillhere

You see Absolem there is a jealousy that is at the heart of the left wing socialists that frequent this place. They want other people to do what they claim needs done.

Posted 23 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Whats the matter ole grumpy pus$ ? You have no answers as well ? Deflect away butth ead !

Posted 23 days ago.

Stillhere

Absolem you will never get an answer to your question, there is no end or value put on wealth (other people's) redistribution

Posted 24 days ago.

Stillhere

Nice to see fluffy mcpantload is back, guess the check came in and his internet is back on. Dont worry fluffy we will keep supporting you, we have no choice

Posted 24 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Abby , exactly ! What is this fabled fact from the RIGHTWINGERS ! Nascar, Oh ole grumpy pus$ gets it alright ! He just wont admit that its just more right wing propaganda !

Posted 24 days ago.

NasCarNut

"wealth redistribution"is one of the rights attempts to demonize !

you didn't get the whole sentence, makes a difference...

Posted 24 days ago.

Stillhere

wealth redistribution"is one of the rights

LOLOLOL Wealth redistribution is a RIGHT? Just exactly where is that right granted?

Posted 24 days ago.

absolem

OWO....what is "wealth distribution" and if it exists, in what form should it take to be fair and equitable?

Posted 24 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Idiotic name em and blame em bullsh&t ! "wealth redistribution"is one of the rights attempts to demonize !

Posted 25 days ago.

Stillhere

Its neither, its wealth redistribution GFY

Posted 33 days ago.

NasCarNut

ok then, healthcare program...smh

Posted 34 days ago.

BeRight

Nas, it is not a "program".

It is insurance.

Posted 34 days ago.

NasCarNut

how much more time, money, and energy will they waste to overturn a program for which they have nothing to replace it with??...

Posted 34 days ago.

NasCarNut

relax folks, they're not giving up yet...third times a charm ;)

Republicans in Congress are moving toward a plan to use a special budgetary process to repeal ObamaCare, after the Supreme Court ruled for a second time to uphold the controversial law.

Posted 34 days ago.

harryanderson

Of course I was being facetious. Politics should have nothing to do with Supreme Court decisions.

But it obviously does. This case follows the pattern of many others. Republican appointees vote the Republican Party line and Democratic appointees vote the Democratic Party line.

In case after case, the courts don’t decide on the basis of right and wrong. They decide on the basis of party affiliation. That makes them political tools, and their opinions should be judged in that light.

BTW: Scalia follows the party line as much as anybody. Judge his dissent accordingly

Posted 34 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or