| Latest Post: Started By: Rank: Category Are the Second Amendment "rights" of Americans really being "threatened" - or is this complaint just another gimmick to get the right-wing, reactionary base "fired up" for 2012?Well Bob, if you're not going to do it, I guess I'll have to ... Some of today's "pretend patriots" might want to look at what is happening in Egypt ... A real "revolution" isn't pretty ... Some Americans, however, are claiming that President Obama and his administration are "tyrants", and (in the words of failed Nevada Senatorial candidate Sharron Angle) "Second Amendment Solutions" might be needed ... Is she right? Or is she just "right-wing"? Inquiring minds want to know! Member CommentsMunsterAnd the FACT remains :NO CIVILIAN NEEDS AN ASSAULT RIFLE . Hard to argue with the truth ! Posted 70 days ago. MunsterAs usual the ever ignorant greek has lots to say about things it knows nothing about ! Sit back and collect your thoughts greek and then try to say something relevent ! Posted 70 days ago. Kunectdots"Mark Kelly's 'AR-15 Stunt' Provokes Giffords Photo Leak" h ttp://w ww.breitbart.c om/Big-Government/2013/03/14/Mark-Kelly-s-AR-15-Stunt-Provokes-Giffords-Photo-Leak Posted 70 days ago. thegreekNo one on entitlements needs a computer or cellphone !! Rant that up your blowhole. Posted 70 days ago. MunsterHeres a rant for you , NO CIVILIAN NEEDS AN ASSAULT RIFLE . Hard to argue with the truth ! Posted 70 days ago. R1KRA8Feb. 25, 2009 . . . Obama to Seek New Assault Weapons Ban By Jason Ryan (ABC) abcnews.go . . . Feb. 25, 2009 Posted 70 days ago. MunsterHeres a rant for you , NO CIVILIAN NEEDS AN ASSAULT RIFLE . Hard to argue with the truth ! Posted 70 days ago. R1KRA8“They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent” . . . "copy of BarackObama**** Urban Policy (as of January 23rd, 2008)" SEE: References 22 and 23. Federal Assault Weapons Ban Wikipedia Posted 70 days ago. MunsterHeres a rant for you , NO CIVILIAN NEEDS AN ASSAULT RIFLE . Posted 70 days ago. stickhaulerMod, you're "copping out!" Tell us how enacting restricitve laws on law abiding people will keep criminals (who already ignore gun laws) from getting guns? How these proposed laws will make anyone safer? "You gotta start somewhere?" Are you serious? One provision would "allow" a gun owner to "transfer" a firearm to a spouse or child for a period of a week! So, if you leave your firearm in your wife's control, for self defense, and you're gonna be gone longer than a week, you'd need to take the gun to a dealer, transfer it to the dealer, who would then run a background check on your wife before they could transfer it to her. Sorry, but that has about as much logic and reason as a munster/free rant here! Posted 71 days ago. KunectdotsSchumermantics = FOR A PHOTO-OP, standing BEHIND the spokesperson at the podium delivering what he thinks is a 'landmark' piece of legislation (but isn't) while looking over the top of his glasses, balanced on the end of his nose, trying to look intelligent (but dosen't). Yeah, that about sums up another Dweeb from New York Liberalism that has little in common those living across most of the geographical United States. Posted 71 days ago. moderationStick- schumer may be using the same logic as Ryan, in that you have to start somewhere.(-: Posted 71 days ago. thegreekMunster. Re read the past posts carefully. Dont graze thru them. Think with your brain what they say. Quit trying to think how much you love Barry and Biden and concentrate on the words. It is in there. In a nutshell. If you pass the backround check, are not some ranting raving maniac with a crimminal record, you can get any fire arm that you are willing to pay for.!! The AR's have increased in price. Does that clear it up or were you thinking about Biden getting out of the shower when you read that?? Posted 71 days ago. MunsterWell you have to make up your mind , are they easy to get or not ???? Posted 71 days ago. stickhaulerSo, I'm an elitist now? Free, you have clearly gone insane! Posted 71 days ago. stickhaulerMod, since you at least show a rational viewpoint,explain HOW these proposed bills protect anyone? Criminals ignored the laws as they exist, is passing more restrictive laws on law abiding gun owners going to change that constant? I've never bought a gun that there wasn't a background check done. I've gone through more intense background checks, both in the military and civilian life. So just where does the insanity end? Have you read the absolute lunacy of a background check law Schumer is offering? Law abiding folks aren't doing anything wrong, the criminals are! Posted 71 days ago. moderationMunster said "What your going to see gomer is these obstructing republicans shown the door out ! Regular working people have now seen this idiotic anti-labor, anti-woman,anti-people anti-minority agenda and they dont like it !The point is theres alot more regular people than there is you elitist so guess what ?? Obama's president again isnt he !!" Ditto that. I see where the nra wants to negotiate some influence on the senate bill. The nra is conducting business with practices that parallel the union influence controversy around political policies. The number of members that are for background checks is significant. That, may be having 'a second look' effect in their positioning. Posted 71 days ago. MunsterWhat your going to see gomer is these obstructing republicans shown the door out ! Regular working people have now seen this idiotic anti-labor, anti-woman,anti-people anti-minority agenda and they dont like it !The point is theres alot more regular people than there is you elitist so guess what ?? Obama's president again isnt he !! Posted 71 days ago. Post a Comment |