Are the Second Amendment "rights" of Americans really being "threatened" - or is this complaint just another gimmick to get the right-wing, reactionary base "fired up" for 2012?

There is a messenger here that believes, if the law-abiding were oppressed with more gun laws, society would be safer. He makes stupid responses such as, "Decreased ! Not ended !". He ignores the FACT that one of the assailants, in the slashing murder of the British solider in London HAD A GUN in one of the more gun-regulated nations in the world. Said poster has again and again exhibited that he is, in fact, one factually challenged M-Fer.

h ttp://w ww.youtube.c om/watch?v=qyoLuTjguJA

There is a messenger here that believes, if the law-abiding were oppressed with more gun laws, society would be safer. He makes stupid responses such as, "Decreased ! Not ended !". He ignores the FACT that one of the assailants, in the slashing murder of the British solider in London HAD A GUN in one of the more gun-regulated nations in the world. Said poster has again and again exhibited that he is, in fact, one factually challenged M-Fer.

h ttp://w ww.youtube.c om/watch?v=qyoLuTjguJA

"Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face." ~ Thomas Sowell

FACT . . . “He cannot stand it unless he gets the last word in. Doesn’t even matter if it makes sense or not. As long as it is the last word!” ~ thegreek

Williams notes the report is strictly factual.

Does a report from the Justice dept. convince you?

a report issued by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS-a component of the Justice Department) shows that firearm homicides in general, and violence at schools, have decreased substantially during the last two decades; the percentage of homicides committed with firearms has decreased; and only a tiny percentage of state prison inmates imprisoned for gun offenses obtain their guns from gun shows. As the Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin characterizes it, the report is "wonderful news for the country and rotten data for anti-gun advocates." the story has been picked up by some heavy hitters in the national news media. In an article for U.S. News and NBCNews****, veteran reporter Pete Williams points out that the BJS report shows that 40 percent of criminals get their guns from friends and family members, and another 37 percent get theirs from theft or other illegal sources. Lest gun control advocates accuse the BJS or Williams of having a pro-gun political agenda, Williams not

3 days with no response as long as you get the last word in !!

46 of your traitorous democrats voted to give up our 2nd ammendment rights to the UN which is a bunch of commies and you are stupid enough to tell me that our rights are not being threatened. You sir need a head MRI !!

Everyone hopes you leave and never to come back!

"MB Studio Productions High Capacity Magazine PSA"

h ttp://ww w.youtube.c om/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7F1nPSNnaBo

"S.E. Cupp vs. Michael Moore on Guns: ‘I Just Happen to Be Informed’"

h ttp://news.yahoo.c om/e-cupp-vs-michael-moore-guns-just-happen-122813856.html

46 of your traitorous democrats voted to give up our 2nd ammendment rights to the UN which is a bunch of commies and you are stupid enough to tell me that our rights are not being threatened. You sir need a head MRI !!

WHY WASTE YOUR TIME DOING SOMETHING THAT WOULD NOT LOWER CRIME OR SAVE LIVES BUT COST MORE BECAUSE OF LESS SELF DEFENSE OPPURTUNITIES..????WE HAVE BEEN TELLING YOU THAT BUT IT GOES IN ONE EAR AND OUT THE OTHER...

THERE IS NO VALID REASON TO BAN THEM..WHAT WOULD IT SOLVE??

The fact is, our 2nd ammendment rights are being threatened - by your ilk !!

Munster, I was mocking your non chalant reasoning away of these issues.

stick & lts - Munster is one vegetable that should be left alone to die on the vine. Even oneill knows that when his side has stepped into too much doo-doo, to avoid association with it for a while.

pat...you have seen the light. pointless is the word of the day!

It's pointless discussing anything with you! You post about why we'd object to a NEW ban since we already had one, and when you're answered you go back to the lame "valid" argument again.

You have yet to offer a VALID reason to ban them!

You're bound and determined to remain ignorant!