Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
7 days ago.
by absolem
BeRight
#1

CLEAN... ENERGY

Offshore wind farms from New Jersey to Virginia took a big step closer to reality with the completion of a review that showed the renewable energy source would not cause major environmental damage, officials said today. Wind projects off the coasts of Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, and New Jersey are being studied. The Mid-Atlantic lease proposal follows the Cape Wind project in Massachusetts that was given the go-ahead in 2010 after 9 years of federal review."No developer should have to wait nine or 10 years," for approval, Salazar said. The response from the developers was "DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

No the difference is the republicans look at it and say whats in it for me !

Posted 78 days ago.

BeRight

In Europe, the people set goals and want to accomplish something. IN the USA, people want to feel like they are accomplishing something with the goal being to feel good.

That is a big difference.

Posted 78 days ago.

Ohwiseone

How utterly republican of you bewrite ! Anything that would keep big business from profiting from it is bad ! I'm sure that there will be someone who will step up and take care of that problem ! You don't see this level of obstruction in Europe where wind, solar etc is looked on a smart !

Posted 78 days ago.

BeRight

Here is your big problem: The decision by two major utilities to terminate their contracts to buy power from the proposed $2.5 billion wind farm in Cape Cod waters could kill the project, according to supporters and detractors of the plan. National Grid and NStar - a subsidiary of Northeast Utilities - said Tuesday they ended their contracts because Cape Wind missed a Dec. 31 deadline set out in the 2012 deals to obtain financing and begin construction, and had chosen not to put up financial collateral to extend the deadline. "Unfortunately, Cape Wind has missed these critical milestones." Cape Win, what a kimbaya kind of name. The alternative energy people can’t seem to get their act together. Maybe they find some business people to run their business instead of pie in the sky tree huggers.

Posted 78 days ago.

Ohwiseone

If you said "what do you want done "? then there are many things we can do to limit our carbon footprint !

Posted 110 days ago.

Ohwiseone

I don't get your post !

Posted 110 days ago.

BeRight

What do want done?

Posted 110 days ago.

Ohwiseone

97% of researcher say the they think that man has a part in climate change regardless of what your right-wing bullsh^t artists say !

Posted 110 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Yes , page after page of them !

Posted 110 days ago.

Kunectdots

One may want to filter ANY "facts", weather related or otherwise, that is produced or processed through an Annenberg affiliate. They ARE embedded with the designs and desires of one Emperor Barack Obama.

Posted 110 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Google " climate change facts " , the preponderance of evidence says yes we are causing some of this issue ! Now bw aware that there is not one site from Faux and that's because it all about the FACTS !

Posted 110 days ago.

BeRight

Natural weather patterns, not man-made global warming, are causing the historic drought parching California, says a study out Monday from federal scientists.

"It's important to note that California's drought, while extreme, is not an uncommon occurrence for the state," said Richard Seager, the report's lead author and professor with Columbia University's Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory. The report was sponsored by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The report did not appear in a peer-reviewed journal but was reviewed by other NOAA scientists

Posted 110 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And part of the reason for this bewrite is Faux earned an accuracy rating of 28% when it came to climate change !

Posted 110 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Oh now we want to get on topic !

Posted 110 days ago.

BeRight

I am not sure why someone is quoting Fox news statistic.

NOAA reported their findings on the California Draught. I can not help it if all the left wing broadcasts that Ohwiseone listens to, including his favorite ED Schultz, decided to pass on it.

Posted 110 days ago.

Kunectdots

"Faux News" IS gonna hunt you down and kill you. Don't you know that?

Posted 111 days ago.

Ohwiseone

PunditFact: Fox News wins battle for most-false cable network A new survey by the Tampa Bay Times’ PunditFact, looking at the veracity of cable networks, found that Fox News won (or lost) the first prize for having the most falsehoods studied.

According to PunditFact, Fox News’ on-air talent were mostly false, false, or “pants on fire” 60% of the time.

Posted 111 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And as usual the tiredbrain troll gives us the same tired ole line that's been debunked a thousand times !

Posted 111 days ago.

Stillhere

this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing WOW a moment of HONESTY

Posted 111 days ago.

Stillhere

After all its WAS the NOAA climate project chair Monika Kopacz that famously said It is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion, that climate models sometimes disagree even on the signs of the future changes (e.g. drier vs. wetter future climate). The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians' - and readers' - attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today's world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty.

Posted 111 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or