Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
11 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
BeRight
#1

CLEAN... ENERGY

Offshore wind farms from New Jersey to Virginia took a big step closer to reality with the completion of a review that showed the renewable energy source would not cause major environmental damage, officials said today. Wind projects off the coasts of Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, and New Jersey are being studied. The Mid-Atlantic lease proposal follows the Cape Wind project in Massachusetts that was given the go-ahead in 2010 after 9 years of federal review."No developer should have to wait nine or 10 years," for approval, Salazar said. The response from the developers was "DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"

 
 

Member Comments

thegreek

So to date you have called me a racist because I made the comment that not everyone that grew up in the 60's witnesses slavery and racism because they lived out in remote areas. I am a homophobe because I quoted bible passages. And not I am an idiot that has not been paying any attention at my workplace for 35 years and don't care or go to funerals of retirees and have no clue what they died of !!! Sound about right asknot. Try this on - KISS MY A$S. You are one offensive SO B.

Posted 293 days ago.

thegreek

Once again, you embarrass yourself on these forums because of your ideals.

Posted 293 days ago.

thegreek

You Asknot pick any power company - DUKE. PSEG, First Energy whoever and do a study to see how many retired power plant employees have died from lung disease and get back to me and we will see who this applies to - Asknot. I should clarify, one that refuses to at least look into actual knowledge and challenge their own beliefs scare me! And ones that share "knowledge" that is blatantly and obviously untrue and refuse to spend 30 minutes learning truth scare me. YIKES man/woman;)

Posted 293 days ago.

thegreek

ASKNOT your typical closemindedness " I have made my mind up already" is appalling. You will not even allow the PERSONAL experience of a person that has been employed somewhere for 35 years to influence you boner with the liberal ilk. !!! Seamstress was right when she said she was not gonna waste her time arguing with faceless people. YOU will never be able to prove that coal emissions are harmful to me until you do a study on power plant workers that wallered in the stuff they did pre OSHA and safety council rules. Your prefer to blindly buy into scientific, democrat approved junk that suits your agenda, whatever that is??Have a happy life in LaaaLaaa land.

Posted 293 days ago.

thegreek

I do not know of ONE person that died from black lung from where I worked. One fellow died of heart/lung disease because he was showered with AGENT ORANGE in VietNam.

Posted 294 days ago.

thegreek

Most of the people that retired from where I work died from OLD AGE believe it or not. AND there is no ash or cinders in the coal fields that I know of. So you are saying that a person that works somewhere for 35 years if full of it right ??

Posted 294 days ago.

thegreek

I NEVER said I worked in the COAL fields !!!

Posted 294 days ago.

thegreek

The number 1 reason I do not buy into this is the fact that I have personally wallered in coal dust, coal, flyash, cinders and their byproducts for 35 years and none of the non smoking retirees I know have died of lung cancer associated with coal emissions. I have challenged people on here before to explain that to me and no one can. If it is so dangerous then the power plant worker people should be the HIGHEST STRICKEN group there is. But NO ONE can. You would think there would be a study on that if coal emissions are killing people as they say.

Posted 294 days ago.

thegreek

The only people saying that coal emissions are killing people is the environmentalist and they cannot truly say that it killed people any more than car exhausts. No one has ever conducted an experiment where they were in a controlled environment and were breathing in coal emissions or car emissions for the duration of the experiment. SO, it is a non proven theory at best !!!

Posted 294 days ago.

thegreek

And if you read my post. I said the eruptions caused ACID RAIN and acidic lakes!!!

Posted 294 days ago.

thegreek

Asknot. You can believe that but I am not buying into any of it. There is no proof that coal emissions are killing people. No more than diesel truck exhaust fumes or car exhaust. People refuse to give up their transportation so we will never attack that like we do coal. There are insinuations that thousands die from coal emissions but no one can prove to me which source of pollution killed who!!!!All that the ice core samples prove is that the dust was there at which time. It does not prove that it caused warming or if the warming is a natural cycle which is what I believe. There was no one around 10000 years ago to record anything so it means little to me.

Posted 294 days ago.

moderation

We do know that both volcanic activity and meteor strikes impact earths weather.

Posted 294 days ago.

moderation

So greek.You may want to fact check that lost real estate estimation.Given your calculation, it would barely qualify as hill, today.

Posted 294 days ago.

thegreek

I am saying that one cannot assume that global warming and the melting ice caps are caused by burning fossil fuels and not from volcanic activity or meteor strikes.

Posted 294 days ago.

moderation

"The ice core samples do not have a tag on them that shows volcanic activity or meteor strikes causing pollution". What does that mean? What are you trying to say.

Posted 294 days ago.

thegreek

So mod. You dont think the eruption pf Mount St. Helens in the 80's would cause some acid rain??? I mean it only blew 10,000 feet or so off the top of the volcano and spewed a band of sulfuric acid smoke and dust across the US/Canada border for a week. You dont think that would add acid to the lakes and rivers of the countries. That is why I am not ready to blame burning coal as the culprit yet. The ice core samples do not have a tag on them that shows volcanic activity or meteor strikes causing pollution.

Posted 294 days ago.

moderation

greek-are you familiar with the term"acid rain", and how it affects the environment ? I have seen the results of an 'acid rain' in the contractors parking lot near the now demolished steam station that once served the old Union Carbide complex on rt. 7, south of marietta. Dozens of vehicles had significant paint damage because of their proximity to the nearby stack and favorable( if you want to call it that) atmospheric conditions.The acid took the paint of right down to the bare metal.Burnin' coal does have some negatives

Posted 294 days ago.

thegreek

350. o r g

Posted 294 days ago.

thegreek

350**** is a group that seeks to build a global grassroots movement to "solve the climate crisis," according to its webpage, and the group made clear that the warning label fight is solely an initiative by the Bay Area branch. The label's design is straightforward. It has white on black writing, topped off with "Warning" in bold on an orange background. The text reads, "The state of California has determined that global warming caused by greenhouse gases poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources and the environment of California."

Posted 294 days ago.

scrappile

Coal is down to 40% in terms of providing electricity for our needs, natural gas is up to 30%, and renewables are accounting for most of the rest, including nuclear, but investors are not wanting to put their dollars into nuclear, so ready or not, coal generation is waning, but at least we will sell the coal( and our cracked natural gas) to China....

Posted 297 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or